0.06/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.06/0.13 % Command : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 1200 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 120 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 10:13:52 EDT 2021 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.12/0.34 % Number of cores: 8 0.19/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.19/0.35 # Version: 2.6rc1-ho 0.19/0.35 # No SInE strategy applied 0.19/0.35 # Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds 59.15/59.35 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic U_____206b_00_B07_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN 59.15/59.35 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. 59.15/59.35 # 59.15/59.35 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s 59.15/59.35 # Presaturation interreduction done 59.22/59.43 # No success with AutoSched0 59.22/59.43 # Trying AutoSched1 for 26 seconds 85.25/85.43 # AutoSched1-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN 85.25/85.43 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. 85.25/85.43 # 85.25/85.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s 85.25/85.43 # Presaturation interreduction done 85.32/85.51 # No success with AutoSched1 85.32/85.51 # Trying AutoSched2 for 8 seconds 85.93/86.11 # AutoSched2-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S08CI 85.93/86.11 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp. 85.93/86.11 # 85.93/86.11 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s 85.93/86.11 # Presaturation interreduction done 85.93/86.11 85.93/86.11 # Proof found! 85.93/86.11 # SZS status Theorem 85.93/86.11 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 85.93/86.11 thf(cGROUP1_def, axiom, (cGROUP1)=(^[X1:g > g > g, X5:g]:((![X8:g, X9:g, X10:g]:(X1 @ (X1 @ X8 @ X9) @ X10)=(X1 @ X8 @ (X1 @ X9 @ X10))&![X11:g]:((X1 @ X5 @ X11)=(X11)&(X1 @ X11 @ X5)=(X11)))&![X12:g]:?[X13:g]:((X1 @ X12 @ X13)=(X5)&(X1 @ X13 @ X12)=(X5)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cGROUP1_def)). 85.93/86.11 thf(cGRP_ASSOC_def, axiom, (cGRP_ASSOC)=(^[X1:g > g > g]:![X2:g, X3:g, X4:g]:(X1 @ (X1 @ X2 @ X3) @ X4)=(X1 @ X2 @ (X1 @ X3 @ X4))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cGRP_ASSOC_def)). 85.93/86.11 thf(cGRP_INVERSE_def, axiom, (cGRP_INVERSE)=(^[X1:g > g > g, X5:g]:![X2:g]:?[X3:g]:((X1 @ X2 @ X3)=(X5)&(X1 @ X3 @ X2)=(X5))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cGRP_INVERSE_def)). 85.93/86.11 thf(cGRP_UNIT_def, axiom, (cGRP_UNIT)=(^[X1:g > g > g, X5:g]:![X2:g]:((X1 @ X5 @ X2)=(X2)&(X1 @ X2 @ X5)=(X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cGRP_UNIT_def)). 85.93/86.11 thf(cGROUP2_def, axiom, (cGROUP2)=(^[X1:g > g > g, X5:g]:((![X14:g, X15:g, X16:g]:(X1 @ (X1 @ X14 @ X15) @ X16)=(X1 @ X14 @ (X1 @ X15 @ X16))&![X17:g]:(X1 @ X5 @ X17)=(X17))&![X18:g]:?[X19:g]:(X1 @ X19 @ X18)=(X5))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cGROUP2_def)). 85.93/86.11 thf(cGRP_LEFT_INVERSE_def, axiom, (cGRP_LEFT_INVERSE)=(^[X1:g > g > g, X5:g]:![X2:g]:?[X3:g]:(X1 @ X3 @ X2)=(X5)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cGRP_LEFT_INVERSE_def)). 85.93/86.11 thf(cGRP_LEFT_UNIT_def, axiom, (cGRP_LEFT_UNIT)=(^[X1:g > g > g, X5:g]:![X2:g]:(X1 @ X5 @ X2)=(X2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cGRP_LEFT_UNIT_def)). 85.93/86.11 thf(cEQUIV_01_02, conjecture, ![X1:g > g > g, X5:g]:(cGROUP1 @ X1 @ X5<=>cGROUP2 @ X1 @ X5), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cEQUIV_01_02)). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_8, axiom, (cGROUP1)=(^[X1:g > g > g, X5:g]:((![X8:g, X9:g, X10:g]:(X1 @ (X1 @ X8 @ X9) @ X10)=(X1 @ X8 @ (X1 @ X9 @ X10))&![X11:g]:((X1 @ X5 @ X11)=(X11)&(X1 @ X11 @ X5)=(X11)))&![X12:g]:?[X13:g]:((X1 @ X12 @ X13)=(X5)&(X1 @ X13 @ X12)=(X5)))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[cGROUP1_def, cGRP_ASSOC_def]), cGRP_INVERSE_def]), cGRP_UNIT_def])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_9, axiom, (cGROUP2)=(^[X1:g > g > g, X5:g]:((![X14:g, X15:g, X16:g]:(X1 @ (X1 @ X14 @ X15) @ X16)=(X1 @ X14 @ (X1 @ X15 @ X16))&![X17:g]:(X1 @ X5 @ X17)=(X17))&![X18:g]:?[X19:g]:(X1 @ X19 @ X18)=(X5))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[cGROUP2_def, cGRP_ASSOC_def]), cGRP_LEFT_INVERSE_def]), cGRP_LEFT_UNIT_def])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:g > g > g, X5:g]:(((![X20:g, X21:g, X22:g]:(X1 @ (X1 @ X20 @ X21) @ X22)=(X1 @ X20 @ (X1 @ X21 @ X22))&![X23:g]:((X1 @ X5 @ X23)=(X23)&(X1 @ X23 @ X5)=(X23)))&![X24:g]:?[X25:g]:((X1 @ X24 @ X25)=(X5)&(X1 @ X25 @ X24)=(X5)))<=>((![X26:g, X27:g, X28:g]:(X1 @ (X1 @ X26 @ X27) @ X28)=(X1 @ X26 @ (X1 @ X27 @ X28))&![X29:g]:(X1 @ X5 @ X29)=(X29))&![X30:g]:?[X31:g]:(X1 @ X31 @ X30)=(X5)))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cEQUIV_01_02]), c_0_8]), c_0_9])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X39:g, X45:g, X46:g, X47:g, X48:g, X49:g, X50:g, X52:g, X53:g, X54:g, X55:g, X56:g]:(((esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0) @ esk5_0)!=(esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0))|((esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ esk6_0)!=(esk6_0)|(esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk2_0)!=(esk6_0))|((esk1_0 @ esk7_0 @ X39)!=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ X39 @ esk7_0)!=(esk2_0))|((esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk8_0 @ esk9_0) @ esk10_0)!=(esk1_0 @ esk8_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk9_0 @ esk10_0))|(esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ esk11_0)!=(esk11_0)|(esk1_0 @ X45 @ esk12_0)!=(esk2_0)))&((((((esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X52 @ X53) @ X54)=(esk1_0 @ X52 @ (esk1_0 @ X53 @ X54))|(esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X46 @ X47) @ X48)=(esk1_0 @ X46 @ (esk1_0 @ X47 @ X48)))&((esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ X55)=(X55)|(esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X46 @ X47) @ X48)=(esk1_0 @ X46 @ (esk1_0 @ X47 @ X48))))&((esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X56) @ X56)=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X46 @ X47) @ X48)=(esk1_0 @ X46 @ (esk1_0 @ X47 @ X48))))&(((((esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X52 @ X53) @ X54)=(esk1_0 @ X52 @ (esk1_0 @ X53 @ X54))|(esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ X49)=(X49))&((esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ X55)=(X55)|(esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ X49)=(X49)))&((esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X56) @ X56)=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ X49)=(X49)))&((((esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X52 @ X53) @ X54)=(esk1_0 @ X52 @ (esk1_0 @ X53 @ X54))|(esk1_0 @ X49 @ esk2_0)=(X49))&((esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ X55)=(X55)|(esk1_0 @ X49 @ esk2_0)=(X49)))&((esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X56) @ X56)=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ X49 @ esk2_0)=(X49)))))&(((((esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X52 @ X53) @ X54)=(esk1_0 @ X52 @ (esk1_0 @ X53 @ X54))|(esk1_0 @ X50 @ (esk13_1 @ X50))=(esk2_0))&((esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ X55)=(X55)|(esk1_0 @ X50 @ (esk13_1 @ X50))=(esk2_0)))&((esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X56) @ X56)=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ X50 @ (esk13_1 @ X50))=(esk2_0)))&((((esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X52 @ X53) @ X54)=(esk1_0 @ X52 @ (esk1_0 @ X53 @ X54))|(esk1_0 @ (esk13_1 @ X50) @ X50)=(esk2_0))&((esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ X55)=(X55)|(esk1_0 @ (esk13_1 @ X50) @ X50)=(esk2_0)))&((esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X56) @ X56)=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ (esk13_1 @ X50) @ X50)=(esk2_0)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])])])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g, X3:g, X4:g, X5:g, X7:g, X8:g]:((esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X2 @ X3) @ X4)=(esk1_0 @ X2 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4))|(esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X5 @ X7) @ X8)=(esk1_0 @ X5 @ (esk1_0 @ X7 @ X8))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g, X3:g]:((esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ X2)=(X2)|(esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ X3)=(X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g, X3:g]:((esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X2) @ X2)=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ X3 @ esk2_0)=(X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g, X3:g, X4:g]:(esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X2 @ X3) @ X4)=(esk1_0 @ X2 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4)), inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g, X3:g]:((esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0) @ esk5_0)!=(esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0))|(esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ esk6_0)!=(esk6_0)|(esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk2_0)!=(esk6_0)|(esk1_0 @ esk7_0 @ X2)!=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ X2 @ esk7_0)!=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk8_0 @ esk9_0) @ esk10_0)!=(esk1_0 @ esk8_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk9_0 @ esk10_0))|(esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ esk11_0)!=(esk11_0)|(esk1_0 @ X3 @ esk12_0)!=(esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g]:(esk1_0 @ esk2_0 @ X2)=(X2), inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g, X3:g]:((esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X2) @ X2)=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ (esk13_1 @ X3) @ X3)=(esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g, X3:g, X4:g]:((esk1_0 @ X2 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ esk2_0))=(esk1_0 @ X2 @ X3)|(esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X4) @ X4)=(esk2_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g, X3:g]:((esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0) @ esk5_0)!=(esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0))|(esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk8_0 @ esk9_0) @ esk10_0)!=(esk1_0 @ esk8_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk9_0 @ esk10_0))|(esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk2_0)!=(esk6_0)|(esk1_0 @ X2 @ esk12_0)!=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ X3 @ esk7_0)!=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ esk7_0 @ X3)!=(esk2_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17]), c_0_17])])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g, X3:g, X4:g]:((esk1_0 @ (esk13_1 @ (esk1_0 @ X2 @ esk2_0)) @ X2)=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X3) @ X3)=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X4) @ X4)=(esk2_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g, X3:g]:((esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X2) @ X2)=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk13_1 @ X3))=(esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g, X3:g]:((esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk2_0)!=(esk6_0)|(esk1_0 @ X2 @ esk12_0)!=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ X3 @ esk7_0)!=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ esk7_0 @ X3)!=(esk2_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_15]), c_0_15])])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g, X3:g]:((esk1_0 @ (esk13_1 @ (esk1_0 @ X2 @ esk2_0)) @ X2)=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X3) @ X3)=(esk2_0)), inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g, X3:g, X4:g]:((esk1_0 @ X2 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk13_1 @ (esk1_0 @ X2 @ X3))))=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X4) @ X4)=(esk2_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_15])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g, X3:g]:((esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X2) @ X2)=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ X3 @ esk7_0)!=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ esk7_0 @ X3)!=(esk2_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24]), c_0_14])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g, X3:g]:((esk1_0 @ X2 @ (esk13_1 @ (esk1_0 @ X2 @ esk2_0)))=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X3) @ X3)=(esk2_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_17])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g, X3:g]:((esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X2) @ X2)=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X3) @ X3)=(esk2_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_24]), c_0_27])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g]:(esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X2) @ X2)=(esk2_0), inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_28])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g, X3:g]:(esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ X2) @ (esk1_0 @ X2 @ X3))=(X3), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_29]), c_0_17])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g]:(esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ (esk14_1 @ X2)) @ esk2_0)=(X2), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30, c_0_29])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g]:(esk1_0 @ (esk14_1 @ (esk14_1 @ (esk14_1 @ X2))) @ X2)=(esk2_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30, c_0_31])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g]:((esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk2_0)!=(esk6_0)|(esk1_0 @ X2 @ esk7_0)!=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ esk7_0 @ X2)!=(esk2_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_29])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g]:(esk14_1 @ (esk14_1 @ X2))=(X2), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30, c_0_32]), c_0_31])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, ((esk1_0 @ esk7_0 @ (esk14_1 @ esk7_0))!=(esk2_0)|(esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk2_0)!=(esk6_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33, c_0_29])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g]:(esk1_0 @ X2 @ esk2_0)=(X2), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_34])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, (esk1_0 @ esk7_0 @ (esk14_1 @ esk7_0))!=(esk2_0), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35, c_0_36])])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_38, negated_conjecture, ![X2:g]:(esk1_0 @ X2 @ (esk14_1 @ X2))=(esk2_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_34])). 85.93/86.11 thf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_38])]), ['proof']). 85.93/86.11 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 85.93/86.11 # Proof object total steps : 40 85.93/86.11 # Proof object clause steps : 28 85.93/86.11 # Proof object formula steps : 12 85.93/86.11 # Proof object conjectures : 31 85.93/86.11 # Proof object clause conjectures : 28 85.93/86.11 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3 85.93/86.11 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6 85.93/86.11 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8 85.93/86.11 # Proof object generating inferences : 17 85.93/86.11 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 15 85.93/86.11 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 85.93/86.11 # Parsed axioms : 16 85.93/86.11 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 85.93/86.11 # Initial clauses : 24 85.93/86.11 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 8 85.93/86.11 # Initial clauses in saturation : 16 85.93/86.11 # Processed clauses : 3688 85.93/86.11 # ...of these trivial : 27 85.93/86.11 # ...subsumed : 3059 85.93/86.11 # ...remaining for further processing : 602 85.93/86.11 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 193 85.93/86.11 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 85.93/86.11 # Backward-subsumed : 265 85.93/86.11 # Backward-rewritten : 309 85.93/86.11 # Generated clauses : 64885 85.93/86.11 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 63158 85.93/86.11 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 15 85.93/86.11 # Paramodulations : 64549 85.93/86.11 # Factorizations : 131 85.93/86.11 # NegExts : 0 85.93/86.11 # Equation resolutions : 193 85.93/86.11 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 85.93/86.11 # Propositional check models : 0 85.93/86.11 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 85.93/86.11 # Propositional clauses : 0 85.93/86.11 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 85.93/86.11 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 85.93/86.11 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 85.93/86.11 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 85.93/86.11 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 85.93/86.11 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 85.93/86.11 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 85.93/86.11 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 85.93/86.11 # Current number of processed clauses : 13 85.93/86.11 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9 85.93/86.11 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 85.93/86.11 # Negative unit clauses : 1 85.93/86.11 # Non-unit-clauses : 3 85.93/86.11 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 54908 85.93/86.11 # ...number of literals in the above : 238914 85.93/86.11 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 85.93/86.11 # Current number of archived clauses : 589 85.93/86.11 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 68308 85.93/86.11 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27625 85.93/86.11 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3277 85.93/86.11 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 599 85.93/86.11 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 85.93/86.11 # BW rewrite match attempts : 83 85.93/86.11 # BW rewrite match successes : 65 85.93/86.11 # Condensation attempts : 0 85.93/86.11 # Condensation successes : 0 85.93/86.11 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1037803 85.93/86.11 85.93/86.11 # ------------------------------------------------- 85.93/86.11 # User time : 83.845 s 85.93/86.11 # System time : 1.930 s 85.93/86.11 # Total time : 85.775 s 85.93/86.11 # Maximum resident set size: 1656 pages 85.93/86.11 EOF